论当事人和解与传统刑法理论的契合——从功利性视角到正当性视角的转换  

Discussion on the Fit of Reconciliation of the Litigants and Traditional Theories of Criminal Law

作　　者：陈芹 

机构地区：[1]广州商学院法学院,广东广州510000

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2017年第2期63-68,共6页Journal of Hubei University of Police

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目"刑事判决书中法理诠释之实证研究"(GD12xfx10)

摘　　要：当事人和解程序是新刑诉法增设的一种特别程序。当事人和解何以减轻刑罚?法理何在?现有的理论探讨均从功利性的视角进行论证,或割裂诉讼法与实体法之关系,或有抽象空洞之嫌。当事人和解制度的法理论证,应从功利性视角转向正当性视角,寻找其与传统刑法理论的契合点。人格责任论从行为责任和人格形成责任两个方面探讨罪责,为当事人和解得以减轻刑罚提供了实体法的理论依据。基于人格责任论的立场,当事人达成和解,虽不能减少犯罪人的行为责任,但对犯罪实施后的人格形成责任进行了有利的评价,从而减少了犯罪人的罪责。Reconciliation of the litigants is a special procedure added in new Criminal Procedure Law. Why can the re- conciliation of the litigants reduce the penalty？ What is the legal principle of it？ Our country＇s current theoretical researches all analyze it from the utilitarian perspective, some of them separate the relation between the procedural law and the sub- stantial law, or some of them are abstract and empty. How to analyze the jurisprudential evidence of the reconciliation of the litigants, we should change the perspective from utilitarian perspective to justification perspective, and to fmd out the fit be- tween the reconciliation of the litigants and traditional theories of criminal law. The theory of personality liability divides the liability into behavior liability and personality formation liability, it affords us the jurisprudential evidence of reconcili- ation of the litigants. According to the theory of personality liability, the reconciliation of the litigants cannot reduce the be- havior liability of the perpetrator, but aRer the implementation of the crime, the responsibility of personality formation for a favorable evaluation, so as to reduce the guilt of the perpetrator.

关 键 词：当事人和解 恢复性司法 人格责任论 人格形成责任 人身危险性 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]