检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宣蓓[1] 李兴华[1] 方德宁[1] 沈奕[1] 沐阳[1]
机构地区:[1]上海市第八人民医院消化内科,上海200235
出 处:《上海医学》2017年第3期139-143,共5页Shanghai Medical Journal
摘 要:目的观察益生菌联合四联补救疗法作为根除幽门螺杆菌失败后二线治疗辅助方案的临床疗效。方法将165例幽门螺杆菌首次根除治疗失败且经胃镜和病理学检查证实的胃十二指肠溃疡患者随机分入3组,每组55例。预防用药组、巩固用药组分别在标准四联疗法的前后给予双歧三联活菌制剂治疗,对照组仅予标准四联疗法治疗,3组患者均给予保护胃黏膜治疗。所有患者于停药1个月后复查胃镜和^(14)C呼气试验。比较3组患者的幽门螺杆菌根除率、临床症状改善总有效率、溃疡愈合率和不良反应发生率。结果预防用药组、巩固用药组的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为86.5%(45/52)和88.7%(47/53),均显著高于对照组的68.0%(34/50,P值均<0.05);溃疡愈合率分别为88.5%(46/52)和88.7%(47/53),均显著高于对照组的70.0%(35/50,P值均<0.05);不良反应率分别为11.5%(6/52)和11.3%(6/53),均显著低于对照组的30.0%(15/50,P值均<0.05)。预防用药组与巩固用药组间的幽门螺杆菌根除率、溃疡愈合率和不良反应发生率,以及3组间的临床症状改善总有效率的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论两种含益生菌的四联补救疗法均能提高幽门螺杆菌首次根除治疗失败的患者的幽门螺杆菌根除率和溃疡愈合率,并能降低不良反应发生率。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of complementary second-line rescue therapy by probiotics in combination with quadruple therapy on failed eradication of He/icobacter py/ori (H. pylori). Methods A total of 165 patients, who were diagnosed as gastric or duodenal ulcer by histopathology and endoscopy and failed in eradication of H. py/ori, were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 55). Quadruple therapy was used in control group. Bifid triple viable powder was given before quadruple therapy in prophylactic group and given after quadruple therapy in consolidation group, respectively. Gastric mucosal protective drugs were given in all the three groups. Gastroscopy and 14C breath test were performed at least four weeks after medication was discontinued. The eradication rate of H. pylori, improvement of symptoms, healing rate of peptic ulcers and incidence of drug side effects were compared between three groups. Results The eradication rates of H. py/ori were 86.5% (45/52) and 88.7% (47/53) in prophylactic group and consolidation group, respectively, which were significantly higher than that in the control group (68.0%, 34/50, both P〈0.05). The healing rates of peptic ulcer were 88.5% (46/52) and 88.7% (47/53) in prophylactic group and consolidation group, which were also higher than that in the control group (70.0%, 35/50, both P〈0.05). The incidence of drug side effects were 11.5% (6/52) and 11.3% (6/53) in prophylactic group and consolidation group, which were significantly lower than that in the control group (30. 0%, 15/50, both P〈0. 05). There were no significant differences between the prophylactic group and consolidation group with regard to H. py/ori eradication rate, healing rate of peptic ulcer or incidence of drug side effects (all P 〈 0. 05). There were no significant differences in the improvement of symptoms between three groups (all P〈0.05). Conclusion The eradication rate of H. py/ori and healing rate of peptic ulcer can be in
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.208.57