检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学历史学系,100871 [2]中山大学历史学系,510275
出 处:《史学理论研究》2017年第2期87-95,共9页Historiography Bimonthly
基 金:全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(项目编号:201211)的阶段性成果
摘 要:历史数据库是数字技术与史学观念相互激荡的产物,它既是史学研究方法的技术载体,又改进、创新着研究方法。典藏检索型数据库的研发基于传统实证史学理念和文献考据方法,量化分析型数据库的设计则植根于历史研究的社会科学化与统计学方法,而数据库又使这两种史学方法得到改进,发挥出最大效能。近年来,数字人文这一技术革命催生的数据库,给史学方法创新提供了可能,并且与注重文本脉络与历史脉络交错关系的当下史学趋势暗合。The making of historical databases has merged the development of digital technology and historical research. They represent the technological improvement in historical methodology and also help the latter's innovation and expansion. The creation of digital archives and their searchable function extends the empiricist approach to historical study and textual criticism whereas the establishment of large quantitative databases is indebted to the interest in using social science and statistical methods in historical analysis.The development of digital technology has made improvement in both areas. In more recent years,thanks to the growing interest in digital humanities, it is possible to explore more innovations in historical methodology,which can help expand the emphasis of the new historiographical trend on analyzing both textual and historical contexts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46