汉代司隶校尉选拔标准的量化分析  

The Quantitative Analysis of the Selection Criteria of Silijiaowei in Han Dynasty

作　　者：王尔春[1] WANG Er-chun(School of History and Culture,Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050091 , China)

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学历史文化学院,河北石家庄050091

出　　处：《南都学坛（南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报）》2017年第3期13-19,共7页Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University

基　　金：2014年度河北师范大学人文社会科学计划内计划重点项目"汉代司隶校尉的监察区域及其权力演变";项目编号:S2014Z02

摘　　要：汉代司隶校尉的选拔标准主要有两条:功劳标准和"材器标准"。到了东汉有所变化,出现原三公转任司隶校尉的特殊情况,而且个人声誉成为司隶校尉选拔过程中极为看重的一点。在以人治为主的汉代社会,司隶校尉的这种选拔标准相对于预期目的来说,成效是显而易见的。但问题随之出现,一个突出表现是司隶校尉的选拔范围有缩小的趋势并日渐集中在尚书台的官员身上,这一点虽有重视司隶校尉的一面,但其消极影响可能在一定程度上破坏了两汉统治者苦心经营的司隶校尉担当者的公众形象,从而与其设置初衷背道而驰。There were mainly two criteria,namely contribution and individual qualities,for the selection of Silijiaowei in Han Dynasty. The criteria changed in Eastern Han Dynasty and the special case,the transference of the former Sangong to Silijiaowei,appeared. The personal reputation was the most important criterion in the selection of Silijiaowei. In the-rule-by-man Han Dynasty,the criteria and the selection of Silijiaowei had obvious impact. But then there were problems. The striking feature was that the selection range was becoming increasingly small and the officials of Shangshutai became the candidates.

关 键 词：汉代 司隶校尉 选拔标准 声誉 

分 类 号：K234[历史地理—历史学]