民事诉讼立审程序结构再认识——基于立案登记制改革下的思考  

Rethinking Structure of Charge and Trial Procedure in Civil Action

作　　者：唐力[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2017年第3期131-138,共8页Law Review

基　　金：中国法学会重点委托课题"新民事诉讼法实施状况评估及对策建议"(项目批准号:CLS(2015)FLSS-ZDWT03)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：我国民事诉讼制度传统上将诉讼要件置于起诉条件,法院以书面审查确定案件的受理,当事人起诉门槛高且无法参与法院对诉讼要件的审查程序。立案登记制改革将诉讼要件从起诉条件中剥离,作为审理对象在起诉成立后加以审理,便于民众接近司法且保障其有机会参与法院对诉讼要件的审理程序。诉讼要件为法院对本案进行审理并作出判决的前提,应实行"先行审理"原则,结合我国案件受理程序和立案庭的独立设置,将诉讼要件委以立案庭先行审理,构建"起诉审查"、"诉讼要件审理"、"本案审理"的程序结构。It is a tradition of Chinese Civil Procedural Law to list elements of action among the compulsory requirements of commencing an action. And whether accept the ease or not largely depends on the written review by court. Such approach, however, not only set forth an over-high threshold but also excluded litigants from the reviewing of elements of action. To o- vercome these shortcomings, present legal reform withdraws the elements of action from the requirements of commencing an action, and instead treats it as adjudicating object trailed in the proceeding. Such reform will expand the access to justice and provide litigants with sufficient opportunities to participant into the reviewing of elements of action. Being an important founda- tion of adjudication, elements of action should be reviewed according to the principle of ＇pre-trial＇. Specifically, in terms of the procedure of accepting case and the independent case filing tribunal, a second-ordered procedure could be established, which is consist of two separate stages- ＇ the reviewing of filing＇ or ＇the reviewing of elements of action＇ and ＇ trial of case＇. According to this new structure, the elements of action could be pre-trialed by case-filing tribunal.

关 键 词：立案登记 起诉条件与诉讼要件 立审程序结构 本案审理 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]