检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学中南医院血液内科,湖北武汉430071
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2017年第12期1937-1941,共5页Journal of Modern Oncology
摘 要:目的:运用Meta分析来评估二甲双胍对糖尿病并发肾癌患者生存结果影响。方法:检索Pub Med、EMbase、CNKI等数据库,筛选并纳入相关文献,提取文献特征,采用Review Manager 5.3软件计算总的风险比(HR)及95%CI,并评价研究间的异质性、有无发表偏倚。结果:共纳入5篇队列研究。根据肾癌局部与转移的亚组分析结果显示二甲双胍对肾癌患者的PFS无显著改善作用(HR=0.78,95%CI:0.42~1.45,P=0.43)、(HR=0.98,95%CI:0.81~1.19,P=0.84),同样对CSS、OS也无显著影响(HR=0.59,95%CI:0.22~1.58,P=0.30)、(HR=0.78,95%CI:0.50~1.22,P=0.28),(HR=1.01,95%CI:0.71~1.43,P=0.96)、(HR=1.05,95%CI:0.83~1.33,P=0.68)。发表偏倚结果显示不存在发表偏倚(Begg:P=0.658;Egger:P=0.765)。结论:本项Meta分析显示二甲双胍对于肾癌患者的生存结果无显著改善作用。Objective:To evaluate the effect of metformin on survival indiabetes mellitus patients complicated with renal cell carcinoma( RCC) by Meta-analysis.Methods:Multiple database were searched to identify studies on the association between use of metformin and survival of renal cell carcinoma.Relevant information for analysis was extracted.A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk estimate and its 9 5 % confidence interval( CI).Heterogeneity across studies and publication bias were tested.Results:5 cohort studies were included.Subgroup analysis by the localized renal cancer and the metastatic showed that there was no significant improvement in PFS( HR=0.78,95% CI:0.42~1.45,P=0.43),( HR=0.98,95% CI:0.81~1.19,P=0.84),but also had no significant effect on CSS and OS( HR=0.59,95% CI:0.22~1.58,P=0.30),( HR=0.78,95% CI:0.50~1.22,P =0.28),( HR=1.01,95% CI:0.71~1.43,P=0.96),( HR=1.05,95% CI:0.83~1.33,P=0.68).The publication bias showed no publication bias( Begg,P=0.658; Egger,P=0.765).Conclusion:This Meta-analysis showed that metformin did not significantly improve survival outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15