英语学界社交媒体“隐私悖论”研究  

An Overview of Academic Researches of the “Privacy Paradox” on Social Media in English-speaking Countries

作　　者：李兵[1] 展江[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学人文学院 [2]华南理工大学新闻与传播学院 [3]华南理工大学传播法与传播伦理研究中心

出　　处：《新闻与传播研究》2017年第4期98-112,共15页Journalism & Communication

基　　金：2016年国家社科基金青年项目“我国法律引入‘被遗忘权’的可行性研究”(项目编号:16CXW023)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：近年来,域外英文学术期刊中比较集中地发表了一批研究"隐私悖论"问题的成果,涉及新闻传播学、法学、情报学、信息科学等学科。通过对这些研究成果的梳理发现,它们主要围绕以下三个主题开展论述:"隐私悖论"的概念界定;"隐私悖论"的成因分析;网络用户应对"隐私悖论"困境的策略。这些研究成果表明,"隐私悖论"现象普遍存在于用户对社交网站的使用之中;自我披露带来的实际益处是造成这一悖论的主因;对这一悖论的应对更多地需要网络用户自觉主动的隐私保护行为。"隐私悖论"现象说明,在网络时代,"个人信息不得非法公开"的被动隐私含义难以成立,信息公开与否已经不能成为判断隐私的标准。对信息的主动控制,尤其是控制谁能看到自我披露的信息已经成为隐私含义的核心,用户对已经披露公开的信息依然具有合理的隐私期待。In recent years,overseas English academic journals published a batch of research findings about the paradox of privacy. After sorting out the findings of the research,the aurhors found that these studies mainly discuss the following three questions: First,defining the concept of privacy paradox; Second,analyzing the reasons of privacy paradox; Third,summarizing internet users' strategies to cope with the paradox. Results show that the paradox of privacy prevails in people's use of social network sites. The main reason for the paradox is that self-disclosure can bring users practical benefits. Therefore,in order to cope with this paradox,users need to take active measures to protect their privacy. The privacy paradox illustrates that in the internet age,it is hard to establish the passive concept of privacy that 'personal information shouldn't be illegally disclosed. 'The active control of information,especially controlling who have access to self-disclosed information has become the core of the concept of privacy. However,under this condition,users still have reasonable privacy expectations for disclosed information.

关 键 词：社交网站 隐私悖论 关系维持 编辑智慧 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]