检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊峰[1] 朱长才[1] 李国栋[1] 杨浩[1] 朱可[1] 许珊丹[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉科技大学医学院公共卫生学院,湖北武汉430065
出 处:《中国卫生事业管理》2017年第4期299-301,共3页Chinese Health Service Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金"吸毒人群社会融合的困境及促进对策研究"(编号:14BSH089)
摘 要:目的:探讨戒毒工作人员与吸毒者的社会距离及其影响因素。方法:采用整群抽样方法和鲍格达斯社会距离量表,调查分析戒毒工作人员与吸毒者的社会距离及其影响因素。结果:戒毒工作人员与吸毒者的社会距离得分为20.23±5.50;logistic回归分析显示,不同执业现况、对于工作环境满意度、毒品危害减轻知识知晓情况、毒品复吸原因评价的戒毒工作人员的组间社会距离得分差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论:戒毒工作人员社会距离得分较高,戒毒工作人员与吸毒者的社会距离较大;影响戒毒工作人员与吸毒者社会距离的因素有:执业现况、对工作环境满意度、毒品危害减轻知识知晓情况、毒品复吸原因评价;应进一步加强培训戒毒工作人员的执业能力,提高其对毒品认知和降低对吸毒者的偏见歧视。Objective To study the social distance between detoxification staffs and drug abusers and its influencing factors. Methods The social distance between detoxification staffs and drug abusers and its influencing factors were studied with cluster sampling and Bogardus social distance scale. Results The score of social distance between detoxification staffs and drug abusers was 20.23 ±5.50. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that the scores of social distance were significantly different among different groups of professional status, satisfaction on working environment, cognition of reducing drug - related harms and assessment on drug relapse (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The social distance between rehabilitation staffs and drug addicts was higher than others. The main influencing factors were professional status, satisfaction on working environment, awareness of reducing drug - related harms and evaluation on drug relapse. It is suggested to intensify training on rehabilitation staffs for improving their cognition of drug and reducing the bias and discrimination on drug addicts.
分 类 号:R749.64[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117