检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张子希
出 处:《黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版)》2017年第5期90-96,共7页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
摘 要:我国死刑复核权自2007年1月1日起统一收归最高人民法院后,积极地发挥着"纠错"与"限制死刑"等功能。但不能否认的是当下死刑复核制度尚存在诸多不足,如审理方式的非公开性、辩护律师的参与度不足、检察院对死刑复核监督的难以进行、被告人获得救济不能的问题等等,都严重限制了死刑复核作用的发挥,试通过对我国死刑复核现状的探究,提出对于死刑复核制度完善的意见。Since the power of review of death penalty has been returned to the Supreme People's Court on January 1, 2007, it functions as an error correction and limiting the death penalty. But it can not be denied that there are still many deficiencies in the current death penalty review system, such as the way of trial is not open to the public, the participation of defense attorney is not enough, it is difficult for the procuratorate to carry out the review of death penalty review , etc. Through the investigation of the present situation of death penalty review in China, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the death penalty review system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248