检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张江鹄[1] 黄晓东[1] 高黎[1] 易俊林[1] 杨琳[1] 马沛卿[1] 徐国镇[1] 罗京伟[1] 肖建平[1] 王凯[1] 曲媛[1] 张世平[1]
机构地区:[1]国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院放疗科,北京100021
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2017年第5期513-516,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基 金:国家重大研发计划项目(2016YFC0904600)
摘 要:目的 分析上皮-肌上皮癌患者局部区域复发风险和长期生存的相关因素.方法 回顾分析1999-2015年收治的18例首程治疗或首程辅助治疗于本中心完成的上皮-肌上皮癌患者生存情况.单纯手术8例(44%),术后辅助放疗9例(50%),根治性同步放化疗1例(6%).比较各组局部区域复发率和生存率.Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率,logrank法检验.结果 中位随访时间46个月,全组5例(27.8%)患者LRR,5年LRFS率为69%,5年OS率为93%.辅助放疗组5年LRFS优于单纯手术组,但未达统计学差异(71%∶57%,P=0.569).结论 局部区域失败是上皮-肌上皮癌治疗的主要失败模式,进一步提高LC率是改进生存的关键.Objective To evaluate the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and the influencing factors for long-term survival in patients with epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMCa).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 18 EMCa patients, who received initial therapy or initial adjuvant therapy in our hospital from 1999 to 2015, to investigate their survival.Among these patients, 8(44%) underwent surgery alone, 9(50%) received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 1(6%) received radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between these groups.The Kaplan-Meier mtthod was used to calculated survival rates and log-rank test was used to compare the LRFS.Results With a median follow-up time of 46 months, 5 patients developed LRR, and the 5-year LRFS and OS rates were 69% and 93%, respectively.The patients treated with radiotherapy had a significantly higher 5-year LRRFS rate than those not treated with radiotherapy (71% vs.57%, P=0.569).Conclusions LRR is the main failure mode of EMCa treatment, and further improving local control is the key to improved survival.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3