检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琳[1] 廖京辉[1] 汤海滢[1] 张庆[1] 郭鲜花[1]
机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所,北京100088
出 处:《中华放射医学与防护杂志》2017年第5期398-400,共3页Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
基 金:中国科协精品科技期刊工程项目(2015KJQK003-1)
摘 要:目的探讨医学论文的创新性、科学性和伦理性的关系,为提升论文的学术质量提供借鉴和参考。方法以《中华放射医学与防护杂志》为例,介绍放射诊断与治疗中的创新点,指出论文创新性不足的表现。通过分析案例,说明仅有创新性而科学性和伦理性缺失时,论文也应一票否决。结果创新性是论文的灵魂,科学性和伦理性是创新性的基础和前提。结论强调论文创新性的同时,必须考察其科学性和伦理性,三者相辅相成。Objective To discuss on the relationship among innovation, scientific nature and ethics in medical articles, in order to improve the academic quality of manuscripts. Methods Take Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection as an example, innovation was emphasized in the field of radiation diagnosis and treatment, while the cases lack of innovation were pointed. However, the lessons from many papers showed that those papers only with innovation would be rejected because of defect in scientific nature and ethics. Results Innovation is the soul of the paper, and the scientific and ethical nature is the foundation and premise of innovation. Conclusions While the innovation is emphasized, the scientific nature and ethics of the thesis should be not ignored. These three aspects are integral.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.190