制定法解释中的想象性重构  

Imaginary Reconstruction in Statutory Interpretation

作　　者：王云清[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2017年第3期50-57,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金会第60批次面上资助(2016M600498);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(20720171006);厦门大学人文社会科学"校长基金.创新团队"课题"法理学前沿问题研究"

摘　　要：法律解释中的想象性重构方法要求法官站在立法者的立场,设想立法者若处在当下会如何回答法律问题。想象性重构解释方法来源于"制定法的衡平"理念,承认法律语言存在模糊性或者可能与当下语境并不契合,并主张司法者站在立法者的角度推断立法者的意图。想象性重构可以在适用意图、语义意图和目的性意图三种不同的概括程度上展开,这就要求法官综合考虑相关理由以得出融贯的结论。然而,想象性重构毕竟是一种实质评价性的漏洞填补方法,在司法实践过程中解释者必须注意立法意图的参照系和概括程度的选择、重建历史条件的难题和价值选择三个难题。唯有同时借助感性认识和理性认识,法官才能够从想象性重构中获得妥当解释。Interpreter of statute who uses imaginary reconstruction tries to discover the intention of law - maker with re- spect to the particular point in controversy, if they are present. Imaginary reconstruction, which stems from the idea of ＇ equity in statute＇ , argues that judges should imagine what legislator would say in the face of ambiguity or obscene of statutory language. The intention of legislator reconstructed can be divided into three type - application intention, semantic intention, and purposive intention - which means judges using this method should consider all relavent information so as to get a coherent result . As a substantive - evaluating gap filling methods, however, interpreters should pay attention to questions about the generality level and proxy of legislative intention, the reconstruction of historical condition and value judgement. Only by perceptual knowledge and rational knowledge, can judges receive appropriate answer from imaginary reconstruction.

关 键 词：想象性重构 立法意图 制定法的衡平 漏洞填补 

分 类 号：DF0-051[政治法律—法学理论]