检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2017年第3期71-73,106,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
摘 要:英美对抗制诉讼模式下产生了品格证据排除规则,品格证据因可能侵犯被告人公平审判权而被法庭排除。我国刑事诉讼实践中普遍存在对被告人品格证据的使用,但却无系统化的规则予以约束。品格证据的运用使被告人面临道德审判,侵犯了被告人的公平审判权。因此,有必要构建我国刑事品格证据排除规则。司法实践中对未成年被告人品格证据的运用,以及相关的立法使我国有构建品格证据规则的可能。Exclusionary rule of character evidence arises from Anglo American adversarial litigation model. Because of possible infringement of the defendant's fair jurisdiction, character evidence was ruled out by the court. The existence of the character evidence in the criminal procedure practice in China is out of the constraint by the systematic rules. The defendant will face moral judgment with the use of character evidence, and the defendant's right to a fair trial will be violated. Thus, it is necessary to construct the exclusionary rule of criminal character evidence in China. Application of character evidence of juvenile defendants in judicial practice, and the relevant legislative provided the possibility to construct the character evidence rules in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33