检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔺新茂[1]
出 处:《上海体育学院学报》2017年第3期1-8,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(11BTY040)
摘 要:比较研究中的"可比性"不仅要求比较对象具有相似性或相关性,而且强调比较对象隐含的差异性或异质性,这是比较研究的本质特征和存在的逻辑基础。目前我国一些体育比较研究往往忽视对比较对象"可比性"的考察与分析,将研究仅停留在"简单比对"式的附会、借鉴或移植上,因而造成研究结论的偏差和悖谬。以"背景可比性"为例,对我国体育比较研究的部分成果和现象进行调研与分析,阐释体育比较研究中由于忽视"可比性"而出现的结论悖谬,以引起研究者的重视。" The comparability " in comparative study field requires the similarities or correlation, as well as the differences or heterogeneity between the comparison objects, which is the essential characteristic and the logical foundation for the existence of comparable study. However, in the field of comparative sport research in China, quite a lot often neglect the investigation and analysis of "the comparability" between comparison objects, with the assumption, reference or transplant of the " simple comparison" instead, resulting in the deviation and paradox of the conclusion. This study, with "the background comparability" as a model, makes an insightful investigation and analysis into some of the results related to the comparative study of sport in our country, and expounds some paradoxes resulting from the ignorance of "comparability", for the purpose of the researchers' attention.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3