《楚辞》训诂研究的传承与发展  

Historical Inheritance and Development of the Exegetics Study of Chu Ci

作　　者：张学城[1] 

机构地区：[1]南通大学文学院,江苏南通226019

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期76-82,共7页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金项目(15ZWB003);教育部社会科学基金项目(11YJC770085)

摘　　要：《楚辞》是一部具有浓郁地域文化色彩的上古文献,自汉以降一直不断有学者对其进行解诂。传统的《楚辞》训诂研究经历了汉代的初创期、宋元的发展期、明清的兴盛期,取得了比较丰硕的成果。然而传统的《楚辞》训诂研究本身具有一定的局限性:一是研究资料的缺失;二是现存传世文献的不可靠性;三是研究方法的缺陷。这些局限禁锢了《楚辞》训诂研究的进一步的发展。"二重证据法"的提出和近年来不断涌现的出土文献资料,为《楚辞》校诂研究提供了新的方法和思路。运用新方法和新材料可以解决《楚辞》训诂中的诸多疑难问题:订正《楚辞》文本在流传过程中产生的讹误,以获得一个"近真"的文本;重新解读《楚辞》,以求获得一个准确的文义;有益于进一步探讨屈原的生平、仕履等疑难问题。Chu Ci is an antediluvian literature with strong local color of culture. Scholars have kept interpreting since Chu Ci was finished. Traditional study on the exegetics of Chu Ci experienced start-up period in Han dynasty, evolution period in Song and Yuan dynasties, prosperous period in Ming and Qing dynasties, which achieved fruitful results in these periods. However, traditional interpretations of Chu Ci have some limitations, and these limitations impose restrictions on the further development of the interpretations of Chu Ci. Wang Guo-wei pioneered evidence methods of two dimensions and proliferation of excavated documents can provide new method and mentality for exegetics study of Chu Ci, which can solve many problems in the exegetics of Chu Ci.

关 键 词：《楚辞》 训诂 出土文献 二重证据法 

分 类 号：H131[语言文字—汉语] I207.22[文学—中国文学]