百年中国文学史著中的郁达夫书写——围绕颓废情欲描写问题的考察  

The Narration of Yu Dafu in the Century-old Chinese Literary History Works——A Study of the Description of Decadent Lust

作　　者：张晓霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西科技师范学院文化与传播学院,广西来宾546100

出　　处：《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期9-14,共6页Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：基金项目:广西高等学校优秀中青年骨干教师第二期培养工程

摘　　要：同一个作家在不同时代的文学史著中呈现的形象是不完全一样的。论文围绕颓废情欲描写问题,梳理1920年代以来的百年中国文学史著,揭示文学史著中的郁达夫形象,并以史实彰显编写者对于文学的理解。民国文学史对郁达夫颓废情欲描写问题基本持肯定态度,但大多是印象式的介绍与评论。五六十年代文学史著坚持的是"政治标准第一"的编写原则,以阶级分析方法评析郁达夫,关于郁达夫颓废情欲描写的评价褒贬与共。新时期的文学史著开始重视文学作品自身的特点和实际的艺术个性以及艺术成就,文学史著作关于郁达夫的书写更加开放宽容,走向艺术化、个性化和多元化。A writer may have different images in literary history works of different eras. Centered round the description of decadent lust, this paper aims to systematize the century-old Chinese literary history works since the 1920s, to reveal the image of Yu Dafu in literary history works and to demonstrate the author＇ s understanding of literature by means of historical facts. Though affirmative of Yu Dafu＇ s description of decadent lust, the literary history of the Republic of China presented mostly impressionistic introductions and reviews ; while the literary historiography of the 1950s and 1960s adhered to the principle of placing the ＂ political standard first＂ in their writing, so the class analysis method was used in the analysis of Yu Dafu and there were both appreciative and depreciative reviews of Yu Dafu＇ s decadent lust description. In the new period literary historiography has begun to pay attention to the characteristics as well as actual artistic personality and artistic achievements of respective literary works, so the narration of Yu Dafu in literary history works have become more open and tolerant, thus being art-oriented, individualized and diversified.

关 键 词：文学史著 郁达夫 颓废情欲描写 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]