检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张静静[1] 张惠琴[1] 陶小娟[1] 卢星辰[1] 党荣[1] 孙新[1]
出 处:《山西医科大学学报》2017年第5期485-488,共4页Journal of Shanxi Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨培门冬酶(polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase,PEG-ASP)和左旋门冬酰胺酶(L-asparaginase,L-ASP)在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)中疗效。方法回顾性分析第四军医大学西京医院2010-01-01~2015-01-01 88例初发的ALL患儿的临床资料,在诱导缓解期随机接受L-ASP治疗42例,PEG-ASP治疗46例,比较两组患儿临床疗效及不良反应。结果 PEG-ASP组与L-ASP组患儿诱导治疗的完全缓解(complete remission,CR)率比较(88.6%vs 87.8%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PEG-ASP组对骨髓抑制程度重于L-ASP组,且对骨髓抑制持续时间长于L-ASP组(均P<0.05)。PEG-ASP组后续发生中枢神经系统白血病(central nervous system leukemia,CNSL)比例显著低于L-ASP组(6.82%vs 24.39%,P<0.05)。PEG-Asp组患儿凝血功能障碍持续时间[(8.65±3)d]长于L-ASP组[(7.52±2.16)d](P<0.05)。两组其余不良反应方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PEG-ASP治疗时,骨髓抑制、血常规、血凝恢复正常时间长,余不良反应发生率与L-ASP相似,PEG-ASP可作为儿童ALL一线治疗的选择。Objective To explore the efficacy of pegaspargase( PEG-ASP) and L-asparaginase( L-ASP) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia( ALL). Methods Clinical data of 88 patients with first-episode ALL were retrospectively analyzed in Xijing Hospital of Fourth Military University from January 2010 to January 2015. Of 88 patients,42 patients were treated with L-ASP,and 46 patients were treated with PEG-ASP during the induction remission period. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The complete remission( CR) rate was 88. 6% and 87. 8% in PEG-ASP group and L-ASP group,respectively( P 〉 0. 05). The bone marrow suppression degree in PEG-ASP group was more severe than that in L-ASP group,and the duration of bone marrow suppression was significantly longer( P 〈 0. 05). The incidence of central nervous system leukemia in L-ASP group was significantly lower than that in PEG-ASP group(6. 82% vs 24. 39%,P 〈 0. 05). The duration of coagulation dysfunction in PEG-ASP group[(8. 65 ± 3) d] was longer than that in L-ASP group[(7. 52 ± 2. 16) d]( P 〈 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the other adverse reactions between the two groups( P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion The recovery time of blood routine,blood clotting routine and bone marrow proliferation inhibition in PEG-ASP group are longer than those in L-ASP group. The incidence of other adverse effects in two groups are similar. PEG-ASP can be used as the first-line treatment for ALL children.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249