检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350
出 处:《淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第3期254-259,共6页Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目"基于逻辑视域的认知研究"(11AZD056);教育部社科基金项目"认知科学视域的延展心灵问题研究"(15YJC720005)
摘 要:认知是能够延展的,但是,这不是基于传统的"均等原则"和"耦合构成论证"的认识,而是基于认知标志的设定。因为功能上的均等并不能保证过程上的均等,而耦合之于构成并不充分。认知标志的设定和延展认知假设的主张看似不可调和,其根源在于认知上的唯我论。但是,事实上,并没有绝对的理由把脑作为心智的唯一机制,仅仅是出于一种偶然的经验证实而已。因此,认知标志完全可以发生于脑之外的世界,这也就意味着认知过程可以是跨颅的,所以认知是能够延展的。It's generally accepted that cognition is extendible.However,this paper is intended to question the conventional'parity principle'and'coupling-constitution argument'that was used to explain it,in that functional parity cannot guarantee procedural parity meanwhile coupling alone is insufficiently constitutive.Instead,we propose we adopt mark of cognition as the basis of extended cognition.Though seemingly absurd due to its solipsism origin,the theory of mark of cognition has in fact revealed that there's actually no absolute evidence so far that brain activity is the only blueprint of mind and what we get is but an'accidental empirical verification'of said process.Alternatively,assuming mark of cognition existed outside our brain we may have an explanation to the question,showing that cognition is transcranial therefore extendible.
关 键 词:延展认知 认知标志 均等原则 耦合构成论证 非衍生内容
分 类 号:B842.1[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.213.242