不同脱敏剂在龈下刮治根面平整术后牙本质过敏的临床疗效对比研究  

Comparative study on the clinical efficacy of different desensitizers in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity after subgingival scaling of the root surface planing

作　　者：晏祥任 洪卓酌 霍小玲 

机构地区：[1]广东省佛山市顺德区第二人民医院口腔科,广东佛山528305

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2017年第14期94-96,共3页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨不同脱敏剂在龈下刮治根面平整术后牙本质过敏的临床疗效。方法选取我院2015年3月~2016年9月收治的75例龈下刮治根面平整术后牙本质过敏患者,随机分为实验组(38例)和对照组(37例)。实验组给予Gluma治疗;对照组给予口腔脱敏糊剂治疗。观察并比较两组治疗后15 min、1个月、3个月的临床效果。结果实验组治疗后15 min、1个月、3个月的总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于龈下刮治根面平整术后牙本质过敏患者的治疗,Gluma的临床疗效优于口腔脱敏糊剂,对临床有指导意义。Objective To investigate the effect of different desensitizers in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity after subgingival scaling of the root surface planing.Methods 150 cases of dentin hypersensitivity after subgingival scaling of the root surface planing from March 2015 to September 2016 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into the experimental group （n=38） and the control group （n=37）,75 cases in each group.The experiment group was treated with Gluma treatment,the control groupwas treated with oral desensitized paste treatment.The clinical efficacy of 15 rain,1 month,and 3 months after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of 15 rain,1 month,and 3 months after treatment in the experiment group was higher than that in the control group,with significant difference （P〈0.05）.Conclusion Gluma treatment in dentin hypersensitivity after subgingival scaling of the root surface planing is better than that the oral desensitized paste treatment,and has the guiding sense to the clinical.

关 键 词：龈下刮治术 根面平整术 牙本质过敏 口腔脱敏糊剂 

分 类 号：R781.42[医药卫生—口腔医学]