国家责任与律师义务:我国刑事法律援助制度的重新审视——基于法援案件效果不彰的思考  

National Responsibility and Lawyer Obligation:Review of Criminal Legal Aid System in China——Based on Analyzing the Ineffective of Legal Aid Cases

作　　者：刘小庆 

机构地区：[1]成都高新区管理委员会经贸发展局,四川成都610207

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2017年第3期29-36,共8页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

基　　金：2016年最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点课题<认罪认罚制度中检察职能发挥问题研究>(GJ2016B15)

摘　　要：刑事法律援助制度的健全与否是衡量一国刑事诉讼现代化程度的一个重要参考指标,其制度设计往往都蕴含着一国对人权保障的尊重程度。在犯罪嫌疑人处于被追诉而无力聘请辩护律师的情况下,刑事法律援助就成为被告保障自身诉讼权益的唯一可能路径。我国刑事法律援助制度的完善,首先需对修法初衷的效果进行分析,然后对制度运行的现状进行考察并找准问题症结,最后需从体制机制上进行通盘考虑。为此,应当完善刑事法律援助案件的管理投入机制,明确刑事法律援助案件的办案补贴机制,建立刑事法律援助案件的质量监测机制,畅通刑事法律援助案件的多方联动机制,健全刑事法律援助案件的惩罚奖励机制。The criminal legal aid system is perfect or not is an important reference index which measures a country＇s criminal litigation modernization level. The design of the criminal law system tends to reflect the degree of respect for human rights protection in the country. If the criminal suspect is being prosecuted and cannot ＇afford to hire a lawyer, criminal law aid has become the only possible path which defends their litigation rights. The revision of criminal procedure law of our country is based on accepting the previous research results of academic circles, and extend the scope of the recipient groups and ahead aid time, namely through the horizontal and vertical dimensions to improve the legal system. But based on the analysis of the practices effect, criminal law aid has not significantly increased aid effectiveness, and this article through to the system running status quo investigation system can find out the crux, and clear effect on the basis of the judicial value of ascension, and further to the overall consideration of system consummation, the last to do system development prospect.

关 键 词：刑事法律援助 国家责任 律师义务 

分 类 号：D916.5[政治法律—法学]