检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第5期55-59,共5页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(13YJA820063);国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果
摘 要:现行立法关于专门管辖性质和效力定位含糊,司法实务中往往将其与专属管辖同等对待甚至纳入专属管辖的范围,排斥协议管辖的适用。根据专属管辖排斥协议管辖适用乃基于公益性目的之法理,结合我国专门管辖制度的性质特征,即可发现专门管辖并不具备排斥协议管辖适用之正当理由。相关司法解释的规定和司法实务中的做法亟待改正。Stipulation on the nature of special jurisdiction and its effect in current Civil Procedure Law is not clear. Still, it is common in the judicial practice that special jurisdiction is treated as exclusive jurisdiction or regar- ded as a kind of exclusive jurisdiction. Considering the reason why exclusive jurisdiction rejects the application of a- greement jurisdiction is its public purpose, and considering the nature of the special jurisdiction of China, it is easy to find that the specific jurisdiction cannot be justified when it excludes the application of agreement jurisdiction. Therefore, both the relevant judicial interpretation rules and the judicial practice should be urgently corrected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.141.66