语言、历史与霸权:葛兰西对马克思主义语言学的建构  

Language,History and Hegemony:On Gramsci's Construction of Marxist Linguistics

作　　者：李永虎[1,2] LI Yong-hu(College of Politics and Economics, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi＇an 710062, China Humanities and Social Sciences Research Center, Xi＇an International Studies University, Xi＇an 710128, China)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学政治经济学院,陕西西安710062 [2]西安外国语大学人文社会科学研究中心,陕西西安710128

出　　处：《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2017年第3期8-13,共6页Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2016M602766)

摘　　要：在马克思主义发展史上,葛兰西开创了用语言学方法研究社会政治理论的先河,由此他将20世纪初马克思主义和现代语言学在世界范围内的双重兴起汇聚于一身。其语言学思想较之西方现代语言学,一个突出之点是将语言的历史性放在首位,由此他批判了三种错误的语言观:美学性的谬误、建立普遍理想语言的乌托邦和生造新词的武断倾向。葛兰西建立的语言政治学是解读其霸权理论的不可忽视之维。在对民族语言形成的路径研究中,葛兰西发现了资产阶级收拢个体分散意志并使之保持统一的秘密。这种语言政治学,在将经典马克思主义的政治意识形态批判扩展至对权力运作的微观分析的同时,也为西方马克思主义后来出现的"符号学转向"埋下了伏笔。In the history of Marxism, Antonio Gramsci firstly initiates the study of socio-political theory with the linguistic methods, incorporating the rise of both Marxism in the early 1900s and modem linguistics around the world. Unlike modern Western linguistics, a particular point in his thought of linguistics is the top priority of language historicity, which is further used to building of a utopia with universally ideal criticize three incorrect views on language politics constructed by Gramsci affords an inevitable language, namely aesthetic fallacy and tendency of subjective assertion for neologisml Linguistic perspective into the interpretation of his theory of hegemony. In the study of approach to forming a national language, Gramsci discovers the secret that the bourgeoisie Collect and unite dispersive will of individuals, While extending critique of political ideology in classic Marxism to the micro-analysis of power operation, this kind of linguistic politics sow the seeds of ＂semiotics turn＂ that later appears in Western Marxism.

关 键 词：葛兰西 马克思主义语言学 文化霸权 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论]