刑法形式(实质)解释论与相关概念关系辨正  

On the Relationship between the Form(Substantive) Interpretation of Criminal Law and Its Related Concepts

作　　者：郭大磊[1] GUO Dalei(College of Graduates Education, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai ,200042, Chin)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学研究生教育院,上海200042

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期79-82,87,共5页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：厘清形式(实质)解释论与形式(实质)构成要件论、形式(实质)解释与形式(实质)判断、形式(实质)解释论与形式(实质)刑法观之间的关系是对形式与实质解释论之争展开论述的前提。将形式解释论与实质解释论之争置换为与之并无关联且早已尘埃落定的行为构成要件说与违法(有责)类型说之争,混淆了二者之间的界限范围。应当对构成要件的形式(实质)解释与对构成要件的形式(实质)判断进行区分并依据不同的语境使用不同的表述。形式(实质)刑法观是形式(实质)解释论背后价值立场的体现和展开,形式(实质)刑法观追求刑法的形式(实质)理性,采用形式(实质)的解释论。It is the prerequisite of launching the argument between form and substance explanation to clar- ify the relationship between form （substance） interpretation theory and form （substance） Tatbestand theory, form （subsatance） interpretation and form （substance） judgments, as well as form （subsatance） interpretatio- nand form （substance）Criminal Law view. The confrontation of form interpretation theory and substance inter- pretation theory is replaced by the confrontation of behavioral Tatbestandtheory and illicit Tatbestand theory, which confuses the boundary between the two. The form （Substance） interpretation of the Tatbestand should be distinguished from the form （substance） judgments, and be presented by using different expressions according to different contexts. Form （substance） criminal law view is the embodiment and development of value stand- point behind the form （Substance） interpretation theory. Form （substance） criminal law view pursues the form （Substance） rationality of criminal law, using form （substance） interpretation theory.

关 键 词：刑法 形式(实质)解释论 关系辨正 

分 类 号：D920.5[政治法律—法学]