情绪感染问卷的中国化修订与信效度检验  

The Sinicized Development,Reliability and Validity Analysis of the Emotional Contagion Scale

作　　者：张奇勇[1] 卢家楣[2] 陈成辉[3] 闫志英[4] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学教育科学学院,扬州225002 [2]上海师范大学教育学院,上海200234 [3]南京财经大学外国语学院,南京210046 [4]云南师范大学心理系,昆明650092

出　　处：《心理学探新》2017年第3期241-246,共6页Psychological Exploration

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJC190030);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2015SJB813);扬州大学校教改重点课题(YZUJX2016-1A);扬州大学2014年度人文社科基金项目(2015/01/07/06)

摘　　要：该研究旨在编制情绪感染问卷并探讨问卷的信度与效度,问卷以Doherty编制的《情绪感染问卷》(the emotional contagion scale)作为蓝本,删除了不适合东方文化的项目,增加了符合中国人的情绪情境和展现情绪方式的项目,经过预测修订后,最终问卷包含5个维度25个项目,正式施测共回收747份有效问卷,并对数据进行了信效度检验。结果表明,探索性因素分析KMO为0.802,总问卷的标准化的Cronbach’sα系数为0.852,项目分析表明项目的鉴别指数D值在0.340~0.479之间,验证性因素分析具有较好的模型拟合度,问卷的重测信度与效标关联效度均达到显著水平。情绪感染问卷的信效度均达到了测量学的要求。To develop the emotional contagion scale and test its reliability and validity. Our scale was based on Doherty - developed the emotional contagion scale. We deleted the items which were not inadaptable to Chinese cultural background and added some items which were adaptable to Chinese life - style. The final scale contained five dimensions and twenty - five items. We got 747 valid scales in the formal investigation, and analyzed the reliability and validity of the scale. EFA showed that KMO score was 0.802. Cronbach＇ s α of the scale was O. 852. Item analysis showed index of items discrimination were between 0.340 - 0.479. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model had a good model fit. The retest reliability and criterion - related validity of the scale reached significance. The emotional contagion scale has good internal consistency reliability, retest reliability, criterion - related validity, item discrimination, construct valid- ity, convergent validity, discriminant validity.

关 键 词：情绪感染 情绪易感性 问卷编制 信效度检验 

分 类 号：B841.2[哲学宗教—基础心理学]