检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高劲[2] 陈晨[1] 陶亚岚[1] 王晓慧[1] 常晖[1] 李晓惠[1] 潘长川 韩非[1] 苏勇[1] 夏云飞[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学肿瘤防治中心放疗科华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室,广州510060 [2]安徽省立医院放疗科,合肥230001 [3]四川省肿瘤医院肿瘤内科,成都610042
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2017年第6期614-620,共7页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基 金:国家863计划(2006AA022484);国家自然科学基金(31170805)
摘 要:目的 在不改变目前T、N、M分期定义基础上,提出适用于IMRT时代鼻咽癌临床分期的降期新建议。方法 回顾分析中山大学附属肿瘤医院2002—2006年536例鼻咽癌病例,采用Kaplan-Meier计算DSS率并Logrank检验,Cox法计算各亚组DSS风险比。结果 依据第7版UICC/AJCC分期系统,Ⅰ—Ⅲ期非T3N2M0期患者5年DSS均在85%以上,ⅣA、ⅣB期的分别为71.8%、46.2%(P=0.171),而ⅣC期的仅为24.0%。Ⅲ期患者中非T3N2M0期患者5年DSS (91.5%)高于T3N2M0期患者(78.6%)(P=0.042)。T3N2M0期患者DSS经临床综合评估与ⅣA—ⅣB期患者相似。新Ⅰ期包括T1-3N0-1M0和T1-2N2M0,新Ⅱ期包括T3N2M0、T4N0-2M0和 TxN3M0期,新Ⅲ期包括TxNxM1期,新Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ期的5年DSS分别为93.3%、72.7%、24.0%(P=0.000),相比于新Ⅰ期,新Ⅱ、Ⅲ期的5年DSS风险比分别为4.01、16.76。结论 IMRT时代把鼻咽癌临床分期降为3个组可以更好地区分预后及指导临床治疗。Objective To propose a new suggestion for the clinical downstaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) without changing the current T,N,and M staging system. Methods We reviewed the records of 536 NPC patients treated in Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center from January 2002 to December 2006.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the disease-specific survival (DSS) rate,and the log-rank test was used for survival differenceanalysis. The Cox regression model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) of each subset. ResultsAccording to the 7th edition of UICC/AJCC staging system,the 5-year DSS rates of stage Ⅰ-Ⅲ patients (except T3N2M0) were all more than 85%(P〉0.05),those of stage ⅣA and ⅣB patients were 71.8% and 46.2%,respectively (P=0.171),and that of stage ⅠVC patients was only 24.0%.In stage Ⅲ,the 5-year DSS rate of non-T3N2M0 patients (91.5%) was significantly higher than that of T3N2M0 patients (78.6%)(P=0.042),but there was no significant difference in DSS between T3N2M0 patients and stage ⅣA and ⅣB patients. Based on the above results,new stage Ⅰ included T1-3N0-1M0 and T1-2N2M0,new stage Ⅱ included T3N2M0,T4N0-2M0,and TxN3M0,and new stage Ⅲ included TxNxM1.The 5-year DSS rates of new stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ,and Ⅲ patients were 93.3%,72.7%,and 24.0%,respectively (P=0.000).Compared with new stage Ⅰ patients,new stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ patients had HRs of 4.01 and 16.76,respectively,for 5-year DSS. Conclusions In the era of IMRT,the new clinical staging system (stages Ⅰ,Ⅱ,and Ⅲ) helps with prognostic evaluation and clinical treatment.
关 键 词:鼻咽肿瘤/调强放射疗法 降期 新建议
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175