文化话语视角下的安全研究:以中国文化安全化为例  

A Cultural Discourse Approach to Security Studies:the Case of Cultural Securitization in China

作　　者：陈文革[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门理工学院外国语学院,福建厦门361024

出　　处：《学术界》2017年第5期75-86,共12页Academics

基　　金：福建省哲学社会科学规划项目(FJ2015B253);国家语委科研项目(YB125-155);国家留学基金项目(CSC NO.201708350050);福建省高等学校新世纪优秀人才计划资助成果之一

摘　　要：哥本哈根安全化理论拓展了冷战后安全研究阵营的空间,是近年来国际关系与安全研究领域中的主流学派,其提出的社会建构主义安全研究方法为当代安全研究提供了较为系统的研究路径,但也受到不同的质疑和挑战,比如在"成功的安全化"的界定上未能充分体现安全的主体间性和安全化的动态协商过程,同时缺乏一套连贯的分析框架。安全话语是一种文化话语,也是一种语境重构,从话语产生、话语协商与霸权、话语语境重构、话语实操四个层次来分析安全化过程,可将语言与社会动态语境结合起来,突出安全化动议的互文关系,体现安全化的动态协商过程,能更好地阐释中国的文化安全化。The securitization theory of the Copenhagen School,the dominant school in International Relations and Security Studies,has greatly enriched security studies in post-cold-war era.However,its social constructionist approach,while providing a systematic tool for contemporary security studies,has also met with challenges and delimits.For example,its definition of 'successful securitization' does not fully recognize the intersubjectivity of security and the dynamic negotiation of securitization and it does not provides a coherent analytical framework.Security discourse is a form of recontextualized cultural discourse.A quadruple analysis of securitization,i.e.,analysis of emergence of security discourses,contestation between discourses,recontextualization of discourses and operationalization of discourses could better account for cultural securitization in China as it combines language with social context,highlights the intertextuality between securitization moves and the dynamic negotiation of cultural securitization.

关 键 词：安全研究 文化安全化 文化话语研究 语境重构 

分 类 号：G122[文化科学]