检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余小玲
机构地区:[1]浙江金华广福医院,321000
出 处:《浙江临床医学》2017年第7期1331-1333,共3页Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨超声弹性成像(UE)联合BI—RADS分级对乳腺微小病灶的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析68例乳腺肿块患者,130个微小病灶(直径≤1cm)的uE表现,根据超声BI-RADS分类,结合UE评分对其进行校正,并与手术病理检查结果进行比较。结果130个乳腺病灶中,良性病灶79个(60.8%),恶性病灶51个(39.2%);BI-RADS分类和校正后符合率86.2%;校正的BI—RADS分类的灵敏度为94.1%、特异度为89.9%、阳性预测值为85.7%、阴性预测值为95.9%,其中灵敏度显著高于单独BI-RADS分类(P〈0.05)。结论BI-RADS分类联合LIE评分可提高直径≤1cm的乳腺微小病灶的诊断准确性,有助于鉴别病灶的良恶性。Objective To investigate the diagnosis value of ultrasound elastography ( UE ) and breast imaging reporting and data system ( BI- RADS ) classification in small 15reast lesions so as to improve diagnostic accuracy of the condition. Methods 68 patients with a total of 130 small breast lesions ( diameter≤ 1cm ) were retrospectively analyzed by UE manifestation. Ultrasound BI-RADS was used for classification while UE was used to adjust the results. The results were further compared with those of postoperative pathology. Results Among the 130 small masses, 79 ( 60.8% ) were benign lesions and the rest 51 ( 39,2% ) were malignant.The coincidence rate between BI-RADS classification and adjustment with UE was 86.2%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value negative predictive value of BI-RADS classification after adjustment with UE were 94.1%, 89.9%, 91.5%, 85.7%~ 95.9%, respectively, sensitivity was significantly higher than BI- RADS classification without adjustment (P〈0.05) . Conclusions BI-RADS classification combined with UE score can improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast small lesions ( diameter≤1cm ) , and contribute to the identification of benign and malignant lesions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.200.242