检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施惠敏[1]
机构地区:[1]张家港市第一人民医院,215600
出 处:《中国实用医药》2017年第15期32-33,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探究长程脑电图监测在癫痫发作患者中的应用价值。方法 25例癫痫发作患者,均实施常规脑电图监测和长程脑电图监测,比较两种监测方式在临床发作、痫样放电方面的发现率。结果长程脑电图监测癫痫患者临床发作发现率(52.00%)高于常规脑电图监测(20.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。长程脑电图监测癫痫患者痫样放电发现率(64.00%)高于常规脑电图监测(28.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。长程脑电图监测癫痫患者同时痫样放电和临床发作的发现率(44.00%)高于常规脑电图监测(4.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用长程脑电图对癫痫发作患者实施监测,能有效提高患者的确诊率,临床应用价值较高。Objective To explore the application value of long-range electroencephalogram monitoring in epileptic seizure patients. Methods A total of 25 epileptic seizure patients all received routine and long- range electroencephalogram monitoring, and comparison were made on discovery rate of clinical seizures and epilepsy discharge by two monitoring methods. Results Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring had higher discovery rate of clinical seizures as 52.00% than 20.00% by routine electroencephalogram monitoring, and the difference had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring had higher discovery rate of epilepsy discharge as 64.00% than 28.00% by routine electroencephalogram monitoring, and the difference had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Long-range electroencephalogram monitoring had higher discovery rate of clinical seizures and epilepsy discharge at the same time in epilepsy patients as 44.00% than 4.00% by routine electroencephalogram monitoring, and the difference had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion Long- range electroencephalogram monitoring for epileptic seizure patients can effectively increase diagnosis rate, and it has higher clinical value.
分 类 号:R742.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.159.13