《辟刘篇》与《新学伪经考》的比较  

A Comparative Study of Criticism of Liu Xin's Old Text Confucianism and The Forged Classics of the Wang Mang Period

作　　者：黄开国[1] 黄子鉴[1,2] Peng Ping 

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学经学研究所 [2]四川大学宗教所,博士研究生四川成都610068 [3]the School of English for Specific Purposes at Beijing Foreign Studies University

出　　处：《孔学堂》2017年第2期56-61,共6页Confucian Academy

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"清代今文经学新论"(13BZX046)的阶段性成果~~

摘　　要：康有为的《新学伪经考》本廖平《辟刘篇》而成。但《辟刘篇》原本无存,其内容存于《古学考》。《古学考》存在行文明显不同的两个部分,这两个部分只要合于《辟刘篇》的基本思想都可用于二者的比较。通过比较可以肯定,康有为否定古文经学的主要观点都源于廖平,但二者也存在诸多不同。就经学素养而论,廖书高于康书,但就思想本质、时代意义说,康书是廖书无法比拟的。This paper aims to make a comparative study of Liao Ping's Criticism of Liu Xin's Old Text Confucianism and Kang Youwei's The Forged Classics of the Wang Mang Period. The original of the former was lost, but its content can be found in A Study of Old Text Confucianism, which, in turn, can be used as a reference for the comparison. This comparison finds that Kang Youwei's negation of Old Text Confucianism resulted from Liao Ping's idea, but there are some differences between their thoughts. In its knowledge of Confucianism, Liao's book is better than Kang's, but in terms of thought and historical significance, Kang's is much better.

关 键 词：《辟刘篇》 《新学伪经考》 比较 

分 类 号：K252[历史地理—历史学]