抗抑郁治疗对帕金森病伴抑郁患者工作记忆的影响  被引量:15

The effect of antidepressant treatment on the working memory of Parkinson's disease patients with depression

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:季俊霞[1] 梁桂文[1] 许振华[2] 王军[1] 

机构地区:[1]南通大学附属医院老年医学科,南通226001 [2]南通市精神卫生中心精神科,南通226001

出  处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2017年第6期513-518,共6页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science

摘  要:目的探讨帕金森病伴发抑郁工作记忆损害特点以及抗抑郁治疗后其工作记忆恢复情况。方法选择同期帕金森病伴发抑郁(PD—D)患者30例,单纯帕金森病(PD)患者15例和正常对照组15例,进行韦氏记忆量表修订版(WMS—R)视听觉指数、汉诺塔(TOH)和威斯康辛卡片分类测验(WCST)评估。将PD—D组随机分为PD—D常规治疗组(左旋多巴治疗8周)和PD—D联合治疗组(左旋多巴+西酞普兰治疗8周),治疗前后进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评估、WMS—R视听觉指数、TOH和WCST评估。结果①PD组和PD—D组在WMS—R、TOH、WCST的各项指标上与正常对照组比较,均差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);PD—D组在WMS—R视觉记忆指数,TOH的准确率、速度,在WCST的错误率、保持反应率[分别为(11.88±5.91),(0.42±0.35),(0.41±0.33)s,(0.88±0.25),(0.57±0.23)]与PD组比较[分别为(15.87±5.21),(0.77±0.17),(0.63±0.23)s,(0.49±0.16),(0.33±0.12)],均差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。②PD—D联合治疗组治疗前后WMS—R数字记忆指数、视觉记忆指数,TOH的准确率,WCST的错误率、保持反应率、概念性水平反应率、完成分类数的差值[分别为(6.73±3.72),(5.95±3.13),(0.45±0.26).(-0.58±0.17),(-0.32±0.15).(0.38±0.09),(3.27±1.56)[与PD—D常规治疗组治疗前后差值比较[分别为(3.77±2.16),(1.91±1.58),(0.23±0.13),(-0.37±0.14),(-0.14±0.09),(0.13±0.07),(1.06±0.91)],均差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。③PD—D联合治疗组治疗后4周、治疗后8周HAMD评分[分别为(16.33±2.72),(10.27±2.66)]与PD—D常规治疗组相比[分别为(21.73±2.28),(18.4±2.47)],均差异有统计学意义Objective To investigate the impaired characteristics of working memory in Parkinson's disease patients with depression and the recovery status of working memory after antidepressant treatment. Methods Totally 60 cases were enrolled in this study and divided into three groups:30 Parkinson's disease patients with depression (PD-D), 15 Parkinson's disease patients without depression (PD) and 15 persons without Parkinson's disease as normal controls. All subjects were evaluated with Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-R) audio-visual span,Tower of Hanoi (TOH) and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). 30 PD-D patients were randomly divided into two subgroups:routine treatment subgroup (8 weeks levodopa therapy) and antidepressant eombined treatment subgroup (8 weeks levodopa + citalopram therapy).The evaluation of Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), WMS-R audio-visual span, TOH and WCST were performed on these two groups before and after treatment. Results ① There were significant differences comparing PD-D and PD groups with the normal control group in scores of WMS-R,TOH and WCST indicators (P〈0.05). There were significant differences in WMS-R visual span, accuracy rate and speed of TOH, as well as the percent errors and percent perseverative responses of WCST comparing PD-D group ( 11.88±5.91,0.420 ± 0.345,0.408±0.334,0.882±0.253,0.565±0.229) with PD group ( 15.87±5.21,0.768±0.167,0.634±0.232,0.493± 0.161,0.327±0.122) (P〈0.05). ② Before and after treatment in PD-D routine treatment subgroup, there were significant differences in digital memory and audio-visual memory of WMS-R((6.73±3.72,5.95±3.13) vs (3.77±2.16,1.91±1.58)),accuracy rate of TOH(0.45±0.26 vs 0.23+0.13),as well as percent errors ( (-0.58±0.17) vs (-0.37±0.14) ) ,percent perseverative responses( (-0.32±0.15) vs (-0.14±0.09) ) , percent conceptual level responses ( 0.38±0.09 vs 0.13 ±0.07 ) and number of categories completed ( 3

关 键 词:帕金森病 抑郁 工作记忆 左旋多巴 西酞普兰 

分 类 号:R742.5[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象