检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童德华[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院
出 处:《法学评论》2017年第4期78-87,共10页Law Review
摘 要:我国当前的刑法立法多次采用刑法修正案对刑法典进行完善,基本上放弃了单行刑法和附属刑法,步上了单一法典化的道路。法典化建立在唯理主义的理论范式之上,但是这种理论范式的科学思维存在诸多问题,它扭曲了刑法立法和司法的互动关系。在立法上不仅造成了刑法内在和外在体系的阻隔和破坏,而且选择单一的立法技术也容易出现问题。根据现代哲学观念的要求,多样化应当成为未来刑法立法模式的选择,它要求以刑法典为中心,协调发展单行刑法和附属刑法。the Chinese criminal code has been revised by amendment of criminal law for several times. It seems that the legislature abandon the one-way criminal laws and subsidiary criminal laws. It chooses the sole codification. The codification way was based on the theoretical paradigm of rationalism. But the paradigm has made many troubles. It distorts the interactive relation between the lawmaking and jurisprudence. In legislation it result the system inside or outside criminal law be obstructed or separated, and it is easy to brine into questions if we had chosen the only way in legislation. According to the requirement of the modern philosophy, diversification ought to be take as the valid choice in the future legislation. It means that in the legisla- tive system, the criminal code should be in centrality , but the one-way criminal laws and the subsidiary criminal laws must al-so be developed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15