检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2017年第3期10-15,共6页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(11BFX132)
摘 要:目前,我国法律规定对于刑事诉讼中司法鉴定当事人权利的保障还不够全面,关于当事人在刑事诉讼司法鉴定的知情权、在场权和异议权的规定还有待完善,刑事诉讼司法鉴定活动中因此出现很多不良现象,导致司法公正和司法效率价值受损。为此,应当促进司法鉴定统一立法,明确当事人在刑事诉讼中司法鉴定的权利内容,加强可操作性,增加当事人委托专家辅助人和律师在场的权利,进一步保障当事人在刑事诉讼中司法鉴定的权利,促进刑事诉讼中司法鉴定活动有序、有效进行,进而实现司法公正。At present, the law is not comprehensive enough to ensure rights of the parties in the process of criminal judicial appraisal, especially the regulations about the right to know the information about criminal judicial appraisal, to be present when the criminal judicial appraisal is ongoing and to raise objections in the process thereof. Quite some undesirable phenomena appeared in criminal judicial appraisal activities due to these reasons, and the value of judicial justice and judicial efficiency was damaged. Therefore, we should promote the uniform legislation of forensic appraisal, make clear the content of parties' rights in criminal judicial appraisal, and strengthen the operability of the legal provisions. Besides, it's necessary to allow the parties to entrust experts and lawyers to be present when criminal judicial appraisal is going on. In this way, we can further protect the rights of parties in criminal judicial appraisal process, make criminal judicial appraisal activities orderly and effective, and ultimately promote the realization of judicial justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46