检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔺小涵
出 处:《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第3期118-122,共5页Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:庭前审查程序作为刑事诉讼庭前的必经程序,发挥着举足轻重的作用,2012年中国新颁布的刑事诉讼法初步构建起庭前审查模式的雏形,该制度在推进构建完整庭前审查模式的同时,也存在着一系列问题。其中对于法院在庭前审查时认为检察院所起诉罪名不当,从而通过管辖权的转移对案件进行实质审查这一缺陷显得尤为突出,这就需要对我国庭前审查自身性质、处理事项范围以及可管辖移送案件事由、法律条文所出现的矛盾做更进一步的定性与细化。只有这样才能更好地维护当事人及其他诉讼参与人诉讼权利,充分发挥庭前审查的作用。As a necessary procedure before criminal proceedings, pretrial review procedure plays an important role. In 2012, China's newly promulgated criminal procedure law initially constructed the proto- type of the pretrial review model which has a series of problems while promoting the construction of a complete pretrial review model. Among them, a defect that in pretrial review procedure courts regard accu- sations prosecuted by procuratorates are improper, thus through jurisdiction shift courts investigate the ca- ses substantially is particularly prominent. This requires further qualitative refinement of China's pretrial review procedure's nature, scope of handling matters and reasons of jurisdiction shift cases, contradictions in the legal provisions. Only in this way can we better safeguard litigant rights of litigants and other litigation participants, and give full play to the functions of pretrial review procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170