检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨佩[1]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学,哲学专业博士生西安710049
出 处:《广西民族研究》2017年第3期71-77,共7页GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES
摘 要:民族共识和民族冲突一直以来都是民族研究的重要问题,民族的差异性并不是民族冲突的根源,而是民族共识的基础。在现代性背景下,传统文化与现代的激烈碰撞成为民族共识达成的主要障碍。本文试图从哈贝马斯的现代性理论出发,以交往理性为手段,考察民族共识的生成机制。哈贝马斯将现代性危机归之于生活世界殖民化,用交往合理化来重建生活世界,从而为民族共识的达成打下坚实的基础。Ethnic consensus and ethnic conflict have always been the important issues of ethnic research, the difference of ethnicity is not the source of conflict but the basis of ethnic consensus. In the context of modernity, the fierce collision between traditional culture and modern culture is the main obstacle for reaching a consensus. This article tries to investigate the generative mechanism of ethnic consensus by means of using communication rationality which based on Habermas' theory of modernity. By ascribing the crisis of modernity to the colonization of life world, Habermas uses the communication rationalization to rebuild the life world which makes a firm foundation for ethnic consensus.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118