检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹代荣[1] 肖泽彬[1] 林禹[1] 刘碧英[2] 佘德君[1] 郑颖彦 张宇阳[1]
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属第一医院影像科,350005 [2]福建卫生职业技术学院附属省直机关医院医学影像科,350005
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2017年第6期764-768,共5页Journal of Clinical Radiology
基 金:福建省卫生系统中青年骨干人才培养项目(编号:2013-ZQN-JC-12)
摘 要:目的在Essen卒中风险评分量表(ESRS)模型基础上,结合颈动脉高分辨MR成像技术,建立改良脑卒中风险评分模型(RSRS)。方法回顾性分析41例缺血性脑卒中(AIS)初发和再发患者的临床及实验室指标,所有患者均行高分辨MR序列成像,对比初发及再发AIS患者颈动脉斑块负荷和成分的差别,并进行Logstic多因素回归分析,筛选出独立危险因素并逐步构建分层方案,联合ESRS形成改良的RSRS,利用ROC曲线评估ESRS及RSRS预测卒中再发的准确性。结果 (1)再发组与初发组AIS患者高血压、糖尿病、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)、总胆固醇(TC)、标准化管壁指数(NWI)、斑块内出血(IPH)比例、破裂的纤维帽(FCR)比例、富含脂质坏死核心(LRNC)最大面积/指数和IPH最大面积/指数组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)LDL-C、IPH、FCR、NWI值及LRNC指数是AIS患者发生再发脑卒中的独立危险因素。(3)ROC曲线显示,ESRS及RSRS评分的曲线下面积分别为0.890和0.912,当RSRS评分=6分时,其敏感性及特异性最高。结论 ESRS和RSRS均对AIS再发有明确的预测价值,但改良后的RSRS预测价值更大;RSRS评分=6分可作为预测AIS再发风险的分层方案。Objective To develop an optimized stroke risk score system from the revised stroke risk score(RSRS)based on the Essen Stroke Risk Score(ESRS) using carotid high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging(MRI). Methods 41 patients with AIS,including initial and recurrent AIS,were enrolled in this study. All patients' clinical information,laboratory tests and radiological information were retrospectively analyzed. Carotid plaque high-resolution MR imaging was performed in all patients. The carotid plaque burden and compositional features were compared between the initial and recurrent stroke patients. All the potential risk components in relation to recurrent AIS were determined by multiple Logistic regression analysis. The best weighting scheme for all independent predictors were determined and enrolled into RSRS. The value of RSRS in prediction for recurrent AIS was compared with ESRS using a receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC). Results(1) The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus,the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) and total cholesterol(TC),the mean NWI,the prevalence of fibrous cap rupture(FCR) and intra-plaque hemorrhage(IPH),the max LRNC and index of LRNC,the max IPH and index of IPH were statistically significant between the two groups(all P〈0. 05).(2) LDL-C,IPH,FCR,NWI and LRNC index were independent risk factors in prediction of recurrent AIS.(3) AUC of ESRS and RSRS was 0. 890 and 0. 912 using ROC,respectively. RSRS = 6 resulted in the highest sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion Both ESRS and RSRS were valuable in the prediction for recurrent AIS patients,but ESRS was much more valuable. RSRS = 6 was the critical value for the prediction of the high-risk population of recurrence.
关 键 词:缺血性脑卒中 再发性脑卒中 Essen卒中风险评分量表 颈动脉高分辨成像 动脉粥样硬化
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15