民间借贷关系中诉讼时效强制性之反思  

Reflection on Coerciveness of Limitation of Action in Private Loan

作　　者：胡安琪[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院

出　　处：《理论界》2017年第6期67-73,共7页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：传统学说与立法将诉讼时效制度定位为强制性规范,但近年时效法改革的趋势是向任意性规范变动。在民间借贷领域,强制性诉讼时效的公益性价值基础与民间借贷合同的特性相矛盾,法理与情理相冲突,导致非规范的私力救济以及社会信赖的悖反。诉讼时效应作为任意法规范,允许约定缩短诉讼时效但不设置法定最短时效期间,以充分保障意思自治;允许协议延长诉讼时效但应设置最长时效期间的强制边界,防止私权滥用;对预先抛弃时效利益通过最长时效期间和主体限制进行双重规制。Traditional theory and legislation consider the limitation of action as imperative regulation, but the trend of the reform in limitation of action is inclined to permissive regulation in recent years.In the field of private lending, the public interest basis of compulsory litigation and the characteristics of private lending is contradictory and jurisprudence conflicts with reason, which results in nonstandard private remedy and the paradox of social trust.As permissive regulation, it should permit the agreement of shortening the length of limitation of action, to ensure the autonomy, should permit the agreement of extending the limitation but should set up imperative boundary to prevent the abuse of rights, meanwhile, set up double regulation in imperative boundary and restriction of subject for abandonment of limitation in advance.

关 键 词：诉讼时效 民间借贷 强行法 任意法 私法自治 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]