论认罪认罚从宽制度的立法完善——以实证研究为视角  

On Legislative Improvement of Leniency System on Peccavi and Sentencing-acceptance——A Perspective of Empirical Research

作　　者：刘广三[1] 李艳霞[2] LIU Guang-san LI Yan-xia(College for Criminal Law Science of Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P. R. China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院证据法研究所 [2]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第4期45-53,共9页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国法学会2015年度部级法学研究重点课题"刑事诉讼中认罪认罚从宽司法实证研究"(CLS[2015]B04)

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度的有效适用有利于促使犯罪嫌疑人、被告人如实供述犯罪事实,减少社会对抗,节约司法成本,提高司法效率。但当前我国法律职业人与被告人对认罪认罚从宽制度的认识存在诸多差异,这一差异折射出认罪认罚从宽制度的立法缺陷,主要表现为"认罪""认罚""从宽"内涵界定不明、从宽效力和幅度缺乏规定以及程序设置缺失。应在厘清认罪认罚从宽制度适用的价值取向基础上,明晰"认罪""认罚""从宽"的内涵、明确从宽的效力与幅度、完善程序设置。The effective application of leniency system on peccavi and sentencing-acceptance is conducive to urging criminal suspects and defendants to confess criminal facts, reducing social confrontation, saving judicial costs and improving judicial efficiency. However, empirical research shows that there is much different comprehension, which reflects legislative shortcomings between the legal profession and the defendant of the system of leniency on peccavi and sentencing- acceptance, such as the unclear connotation of peccavi, sentencing-acceptance and leniency, lack of provisions on the effectiveness and magnitude of leniency, lack of the procedure. Based on clarifying the value orientation of leniency system on peccavi and sentencing-acceptance, system consummation should definite the connotation of peccavi, sentencing-acceptance and leniency clearly, define the effectiveness and magnitude of leniency and perfect the procedure.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽制度 立法完善 实证研究 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]