检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈兴[1] 韦倩[1] CHEN Xing WEI Qian(Center for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China)
机构地区:[1]山东大学经济研究院
出 处:《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第4期65-72,共8页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-13-0352);山东大学人文社会科学重大研究项目(13RWZD07);山东大学青年学者未来计划(2015WLJH17)
摘 要:政府补助的初衷是为了弥补外部性效应造成的企业损失,但是在实际发放过程中,却会受到政府各种偏好的扭曲。利用企业层面的微观数据,实证检验了政府补助中寻租偏好的存在性,考察了权力的地理分布情况对寻租结果的影响。研究发现,寻租活动会显著影响政府资源的分配,但是随着与行政中心距离的增加,寻租活动对获得政府补助的促进作用减弱。考虑到补助发放政策目标的不同,分别控制了创新补贴动机和盈余管理动机后分析表明,创新补贴动机下的政府补助发放仍具有寻租偏好,而盈余管理动机下寻租偏好并不显著。The purpose of government subsidies is to compensate for corporate losses caused by the external effects. While in the actual payment process, they are distorted by various government preferences. In this paper, using micro-level data at the enterprise level, we test the existence of rent-seeking preferences in government subsidies. Moreover, we also innovatively explore the influence of the geographical distribution of power on rent-seeking results. It is found that rent- seeking activities can significantly affect the allocation of government resources. However, with the increasing of the distance from the administrative center, the role of rent-seeking on the government subsidies is decreasing. Taking the different objectives of policy into account, this paper controls the motivation of innovation and earnings management respectively. The results show that the government subsidy under the innovative motivation still has the rent-seeking preference, While under the earnings management incentive, it is insignificant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.59.50