检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属苏州医院甲状腺乳腺外科,江苏苏州215001 [2]南京医科大学附属苏州医院肿瘤诊疗中心实验室,江苏苏州215001
出 处:《临床与病理杂志》2017年第6期1211-1215,共5页Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research
基 金:苏州市科技局应用基础研究计划(SYS201571)~~
摘 要:目的:探讨肿瘤异常糖链糖蛋白(tumor abnormal protein,TAP)、癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)与糖链抗原153(carbohydrate antigen 153,CA153)在乳腺癌早期诊断中的临床价值。方法:收集45例乳腺癌患者为研究组,49例正常体检人群为对照组,比较各肿瘤志记物的敏感度、特异度、准确度等指标。结果:在乳腺癌组患者中,TAP,CEA,CA153检测敏感度分别为80.00%,8.89%,6.67%;特异度分别为100.00%,97.96%,100.00%,准确度分别为90.42%,55.32%,55.32%。结论:肿瘤TAP检测优于肿瘤标志物CEA和CA153检测,可作为乳腺癌的早期筛查指标。Objective: Our objective is to explore the clinical application value of serum tumor abnormal protein(TAP), carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 153(CA153) in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: Forty-five patients with breast cancer were collected as experimental group and 49 normal population as control group. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rate and other indicators were compared. Results: In experimental group, the sensitivity of TAP, CEA and CA153 were 80.00%, 8.89% and 6.67% respectively. The specificity of those indicators were 100.00%, 97.96% and 100.00% respectively. The accuracy those indicators were 90.42%, 55.32% and 55.32% respectively. Conclusion: The TAP had more clinical value than CEA and CA153 as an indicator and could be considered as a better screening index in the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62