Metaphysical Violent Hermeneutic Misreading of Confucian Literary Theory  

作　　者：Xuding Wang Naiqiao Yang 

机构地区：[1]Department of English, Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan [2]Department of Chinese, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

出　　处：《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》2017年第2期193-208,共16页复旦人文社会科学论丛（英文版）

摘　　要：This essay examines the Daoist metaphysical masters＇ hermeneutic misreading of the Confucian classics during the Wei and Jin Dynasties. Applying the concept of misreading as the theoretical guideline, we will first analyze the three important supporting columns of Confucian literary theory： the importance of virtue/morality, the authority of literary sages and the ontology of the classics, and then we will examine the metaphysical masters＇ subversion of the Confucian classics by misreading with their Daoist literary theory and concepts. In their hermeneutic misreading of the Confucian classics, the metaphysical masters in fact fused the original concepts of the Confucian classics with their contemporary Daoist hermeneutics, and the result of such a fusion is that the original meanings as the signified parted from the signifiers--the texts of the classics themselves--and were turned into repositories of contemporary Daoist meanings. In such a hermeneutic misreading, the Daoist theorists forced the Confucian theory and its ontology to gloomily withdraw from the cultural center, and gradually took the spotlight on the historical stage of the Wei and Jin Dynasties. In their open attitudes and flexible system, the metaphysical theorists constructed an age of enlightenment for the development of literary theory. With their hermeneutic misreading, the metaphys- ical literary theorists indeed broke through the world of Confucianism, won the right of expression, and voluntarily moved toward the self-fulfillment of their own system in the Wei and Jin Dynasties.

关 键 词：Misreading Metaphysical theory Taoism Confucian literary theoryOntology 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学] B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学]