论法律条文中“的”字结构的“自指”和“转指”  

Self-designation and transferred-designation of De constructions in Chinese legal texts

作　　者：蒋长刚[1,2] 胡道华[1,3] JIANG Chang-gang HU Dao-hua(School of Foreign Languages, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China/School of Foreign Languages, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China School of Foreign Languages, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092,China,school of Foreign Languages,Jishou University, Zhangjiajie 427000,China)

机构地区：[1]同济大学外国语学院,上海200092 [2]青岛农业大学外国语学院,山东青岛266109 [3]吉首大学外国语学院,湖南张家界427000

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（对外汉语教学与研究版）》2017年第4期56-65,共10页Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"平行建构理论框架下话题结构的跨语言比较研究"(13BY003);湖南省哲学社会科学基金外语项目"基于‘中国法律法规汉英平行语料库’的法律文本特定语句模式汉英翻译研究"(13YBA416);青岛农业大学校级课题"英汉句法层面论元结构变化对比研究"(614Y46)

摘　　要：法律条文中的"的"字结构及其句法环境的句法格式为"NP1+VP1+的,+NP2+VP2"。这与法律规则的逻辑结构模式"条件+行为主体+行为+制裁"是一致的。根据该句法格式中"NP1"、"NP2"的省略情况以及"的"字结构的"自指"和"转指"两种用法,法律条文中的"的"字结构可以分为八类句式及一类特殊句式。汉语中的句法结构受语用规则影响较大,对于"的"字结构的理解经常需要语境来弥补其句法和语义线索上的缺失,因此在法律条文中使用"的"字结构时需要注意其正确性和规范性。De constructions in legal texts require their syntactical structure as ＂NP_1＋VP_1＋ De,＋NP_2＋VP_2＂ in Chinese,which is in accordance with the logical structure of legal rules in the form of ＂condition＋administrative subject＋ behavior＋punishment＂.The omissions in NP1 and NP2 in De constructions which can refer to self-designation and transferred-designation reveal the fact that De constructions fall into eight sentence patterns plus one special sentence pattern in legal texts.Because the Chinese syntactical structures are much affected by pragmatic rules,the correct interpretation and application of De constructions in legal texts relies on the context.

关 键 词：法律条文 “的”字结构 “自指” “转指” 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]