检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨毅[1]
机构地区:[1]北京外国语大学国际关系学院
出 处:《当代亚太》2017年第3期78-99,共22页Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
基 金:北京高校青年英才计划项目"美国亚太联盟体系与中国周边外交的战略抉择"(项目编号:YETP0853);北京外国语大学基本科研业务费青年学术创新团队项目"中国周边外交政策有效性研究"(项目编号:2016JT002)的研究成果
摘 要:自美澳同盟建立以来,两国间的同盟关系不断强化。但由于美澳同盟特殊的历史背景,特别是澳大利亚在外交决策的独立性与结构性限制之间长期存在的矛盾,使其身份定位和国家利益观念的碰撞始终影响着自身安全认知的形成。当战略环境出现变化时,澳大利亚的安全认知就会面临在"历史"与"地理"之间抉择的过程。当前,亚太地区的安全形势正处于不断调整之中,再次使澳大利亚面临着类似的困境。具体到政策选择上,这将对美澳同盟的发展以及中澳关系产生一定影响。Since the establishment of the U.S.-Australian alliance,relations between the two states have continued to warm.However,due to its unique historical background,and particularly the long-term contradiction between Australia’s independent foreign policy and the structural limitations it simultaneously faces,Australia is regularly faced with severe tensions between its self-identity and conceptualization of its national interests.As the security environment continues to change,Australia will be faced with a choice between embracing'history'or'geography'in re-conceptualizing its security identity.At present,the security environment within the AsiaPacific region is constantly changing,which will force Australia to repeatedly address such dilemmas.The specific policy decisions that are made as a part of this process will have implications for the development of the alliance between the U.S.and Australia,as well as for Sino-Australian relations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.121