GEPI关于多项残损的复合计算溯源--兼谈《伤残分级》晋级问题  

Rationalesof combined evaluation of multipleimpairments in GEPI——Class promotion in “classification of the of the impairment related to injury”

作　　者：杨天潼[1] 向思阳 Yang Tiantong Xiang Siyang. ＂(China University of Political Science and Law, Jilin University, Wuhan University）,Key Laboratory of Evidence Science, Ministry of Education （China University of Political Science and Law）, Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学、吉林大学、武汉大学司法文明协同创新中心,北京100088

出　　处：《证据科学》2017年第3期281-288,共8页Evidence Science

基　　金：北京市优秀人才培养资助项目(编号:2013D002023000002);北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(编号:13FXC032);中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队资助项目(编号:2016CXTD05、2014CXTD04)

摘　　要：本文结合《道路交通事故受伤人员伤残评定》、《劳动能力鉴定职工工伤与职业病致残等级》、和《人体损伤致残程度分级》等国内伤残评定标准,对《永久性残损评定指南》中有关多项伤残向整体伤残转化以及复合计算的方法进行溯源研究。从复合计算、GEPI的复合计算和概率论加法公式等方面进行分析,并与我国伤残评定的晋级原则进行比较。为我国伤残评定体系构建提供建议。Inconsideration of impairment evaluation standard prescribed by＂Assessment for Body Impairment of the Injured in Road Traffic Accident＂, ＂Standard for Identifying Work Ability-Gradation of Disability Caused by Work-Related Injuries and Occupational Diseases＂, and ＂Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury＂, this articletraces rationales of the methodology of transforming multiple impairments to an integratedimpairmentand combined evaluation of multipleimpairmentsprovided by＂Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment＂. Based on analysis of combined evaluation, GEPI combined evaluation, probability theory, parameter definition, probability calculation,this article conducts a comparative study on impairment class promotion between GEPI and China. This articleprovides advice on how toestablishclassification of the impairment related to injury in China.

关 键 词：法医临床学 伤残 复合计算 晋级 GEPI 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]