中医治疗消化性溃疡50例安全性评价及生活质量分析  被引量:1

Safety evaluation and quality of life analysis of 50 cases of peptic ulcer treated by traditional Chinese medicine

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:余俊奇[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第153中心医院,河南郑州450000

出  处:《临床研究》2017年第6期150-151,共2页Clinical Research

摘  要:目的 探讨分析中医治疗消化性溃疡的临床效果.方法 选择2015年5月至2016年12月我院收治的消化性溃疡患者100例作为研究对象,根据治疗方法分为对照组和观察组,各50例.对照组采用奥美拉唑、阿莫西林与克拉霉素等西医治疗,观察组采用中医治疗,观察和比较两组患者的临床治疗效果.结果 治疗一个月后,观察组各症状积分均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组未发生不良反应,对照组发生4例不良反应(8.00%),两组不良反应发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 中医治疗消化性溃疡效果确切,可改善患者临床症状,提高患者生活质量,安全性高,值得临床推广使用.Objective To explore and analyze the clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of peptic ulcer. Methods From May 2015 to December 2016, a total of 100 cases of patients with peptic ulcer treated in our hospital were selected as research objects, all the patients were divided into control group and observation group according to treat- ment methods, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with western medicine including omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin, while the observation group was treated with traditional Chinese medicine, the clinical treat- ment effect of the two groups was observed and compared. Results After a month of treatment, the symptom scores in the ob- servation group were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). There was no adverse reaction in the observation group and 4 cases of adverse reactions in the control group (8.00%), the incidence of ad- verse reactions between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Chinese medicine treatment of peptic ulcer has the exact clinical effect, it can improve the clinical symptoms of patients and the quality of life of patients, it has high safety and is worthy of clinical promotion.

关 键 词:中医治疗 消化性溃疡 安全性 

分 类 号:R573.1[医药卫生—消化系统]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象