检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何平[1] 梁杰雄[1] 邵天松[1] 宋辉[1] 张钊[1] 李洋[1]
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2017年第8期1325-1327,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
基 金:首都医科大学基础-临床科研合作基金项目(编号:14JL65)
摘 要:目的比较分析腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗晚期结肠癌的疗效。方法 78例结直肠癌患者,采用传统开腹25例,腹腔镜手术者53例,比较两组患者术中出血量、手术持续时间、切除淋巴结数目及切缘阳性率;术后在院天数、疼痛持续时间、开始进食时间及1、3、5年生存率情况。结果在术中方面,腹腔镜手术在术中出血量及手术时间两方面优于传统开腹手术;在术后恢复方面,腹腔镜对患者带来低创伤对与患者的术后恢复显著快于开腹组;在术后预后方面,开腹切除结肠癌相比于腹腔镜切除较好。结论手术本身所带来的创伤方面,腹腔镜切除结肠癌肿瘤相比于开腹手术具有明显的优势;但远期预后,腹腔镜切除却低于开腹手术。Objective To compare and analyze the efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of patients with advanced colon cancer. Methods 78 cases of patients with colorectal cancer,including 25 cases with traditional open sur- gery and laparoscopic surgery 53 cases, compare with intraoperative blood loss, surgery duration, number of reseeted lymph nodes and positive margin rate ; postoperative hospital stay, pain in continuous time, eating time ; and 1 -, 3-,5- year survival rate in the 2 groups of patients. Results In intraoperative, bleeding volume and operation time in laparoseopic surgery groups were better than traditional open surgery; recovery after surgery, in spectroscopy surgery groups patients with low trauma were recovered significant- ly faster than the laparotomy group ;in the postoperative prognosis, open resection of colon cancer was better than laparoscopic re- section. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer has obvious advantages of lower trauma, but long-term prognosis is less than laparotomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117