检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘辉[1] 刘海娜[2] 王艳冬[3] 张虹[4] 谭玉华[2] 何甜[2] 张建[2] 万雪婷
机构地区:[1]天津市南开医院护理部,300100 [2]天津中医药大学研究生院 [3]天津市南开医院党委办公室,300100 [4]天津市南开医院心血管内科,300100
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2017年第20期1567-1570,共4页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基 金:天津市卫生和计划生育委员会2015年度中医中西医结合科研课题(2015033)
摘 要:目的基于服务质量编制适用于我国护士使用个人数字助理满意度测评量表,并检测其信效度。方法通过参考相关文献、问卷调查以及现有护士使用个人数字助理满意度测评工具拟定量表条目池,通过15名专家咨询、666名样本预试形成量表初稿。结果护士使用个人数字助理满意度测评量表共包括41个条目,探索性因子分析产生8个公因子,累积方差贡献率为65.22%。护士使用个人数字助理满意度测评量表各维度之间的Pearson相关系数在0.213-0.684(P〈0.01)。各维度与总量表的相关系数在0.574-0.798(P〈0.01)。总量表Cronbaeh α系数为0.928,重测信度为0.934。结论所编制的护士使用个人数字助理满意度测评量表具有良好的信度和效度,适用于测评我国护士使用个人数字助理满意度。Objective Based on the theory of Service Quality to develop a scale for measuring personal digital assistant satisfaction by nurses and to detect the reliability and validity of this scale. Methods Through the literature research, cross-sectional study and present satisfaction evaluation tool for using personal digital assistant by nurse to build the item pool. The items were selected by 15 experts consultation and the pilot survey of 666 nurses. Results The satisfaction evaluation tool for using personal digital assistant by nurse scale consisted of 41 items; the exploratory factor analysis identified 8 principal factors and explained for 65.22%. Pearson correlation coefficient between each dimension was 0.213-0.684(P〈0.01). Pearson correlation coefficient between each dimension and total scale was 0.574- 0.798(P〈0.01). The Cronbach a coefficient of the scale was 0.928 and test-retest reliability was 0.934. Conclusions The satisfaction evaluation tool for using personal digital assistant by nurse scale has good validity and reliability. It can be used as a tool to measure the satisfaction for using personal digital assistant by nurse.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28