检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑言[1] 张培富[1] ZHENG Yan ZHANG Pei- fu(Research Center for Philosophy of Science and Technology in Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Chin)
机构地区:[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,太原030006
出 处:《科学技术哲学研究》2017年第4期122-126,共5页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
摘 要:文章首次从实验室研究视角对中医学知识的生成过程给予新的解释路径。中、西医学本质不同已经成为共识,对中医学科学性的追问被对其合理性的考量所取代。中医学以被建构出来的"黄帝的身体"为研究对象,其知识的生产过程因相伴随的各种与境而呈现出复杂性,这也成为中医学知识难以被理解的原因之一。而如何清晰地解释自身成为近代以来一直困扰中医学的问题。如今这个问题的解决我们可以诉诸科学知识社会学的研究视角。实验室研究的重点在于把焦点置于知识生成的与境上,其目的是揭示知识的建构性特质。虽然这种方法受到科学社会学家和科学史家的诟病,但是在描述知识的生成过程层面来看却可称之为范本。The article gives a new explanation path to the generation process of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) from the perspective of laboratory studies for the first time. The consensus has been reached on the issue that there exists an essential difference between TCM and Western medicine, and the scientific inquiry of TCM has been replaced by the considerations of its rationality. The object of TCM study is the "Yellow Emperor' s Body" which has been constructed by doctors, and it presents complicated situations because of the various contexts which accompanies its generation process. That's one reason why TCM is difficult to understand for the common. TCM has had puzzle as to how to explain itself clearly since the modern time. Now we can resort to the perspective of the sociology of scientific knowledge to solve the problem. Laboratory research focuses on the contexts of the generation of knowledge, and the purpose of it is to reveal the constructive features of knowledge. Although this approach is criticized by the academia, it' s still treated as a good model in describing the generation process of knowledge.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28