Comparing the Genotype and Drug Susceptibilities between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in China  被引量:5

Comparing the Genotype and Drug Susceptibilities between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in China

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:ZHENG Hui Wen PANG Yu HE Guang Xue SONG Yuan Yuan ZHAO Yan Lin 

机构地区:[1]National institute for communicable disease control and prevention, Chinese center for disease control and prevention, Beijing 102206, China [2]National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China [3]Science and Technology Department, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China

出  处:《Biomedical and Environmental Sciences》2017年第7期517-525,共9页生物医学与环境科学(英文版)

基  金:supported by a grant from the National Basic Research Program of China 2014CB744403;the National Science and Technology Major Project 2014ZX100030002

摘  要:Objective Mycobacterium avium (M. avium) and Mycobacterium intracellulare (M. intracellulare) are the major causative agents of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM)-related pulmonary infections. However, little is known about the differences in drug susceptibility profiles between these two species. Methods A total of 393 NTM isolates were collected from Shanghai Pulmonary Disease Hospital. Sequencing of partial genes was performed to identify the strains at species level. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was used to evaluate the drug susceptibility against 20 antimicrobial agents. Variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing was conducted to genotype these two species. Results A total of 173 (44.0%) M. avium complex (MAC) isolates were identified, including 41 (10.4%) M. avium isolates and 132 (33.6%) M. intracellulare isolates. Clarithromycin and amikacin were the two most effective agents against MAC isolates. The Hunter-Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI) values for VNTR typing of M. avium and M. intracellulare isolates were 0.993 and 0.995, respectively. Levofloxacin resistance was more common among the unclustered strains than among the clustered strains of M. intracellulare. Conclusion M. intrecellulare was the most common NTM species in China. Clarithromycin and amikacin had high antimicrobial activities against MAC. VNTR typing of MAC isolates revealed a high discriminatory power. Levofloxacin resistance was associated with unclustered strains of M. intracellulare.Objective Mycobacterium avium (M. avium) and Mycobacterium intracellulare (M. intracellulare) are the major causative agents of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM)-related pulmonary infections. However, little is known about the differences in drug susceptibility profiles between these two species. Methods A total of 393 NTM isolates were collected from Shanghai Pulmonary Disease Hospital. Sequencing of partial genes was performed to identify the strains at species level. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was used to evaluate the drug susceptibility against 20 antimicrobial agents. Variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing was conducted to genotype these two species. Results A total of 173 (44.0%) M. avium complex (MAC) isolates were identified, including 41 (10.4%) M. avium isolates and 132 (33.6%) M. intracellulare isolates. Clarithromycin and amikacin were the two most effective agents against MAC isolates. The Hunter-Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI) values for VNTR typing of M. avium and M. intracellulare isolates were 0.993 and 0.995, respectively. Levofloxacin resistance was more common among the unclustered strains than among the clustered strains of M. intracellulare. Conclusion M. intrecellulare was the most common NTM species in China. Clarithromycin and amikacin had high antimicrobial activities against MAC. VNTR typing of MAC isolates revealed a high discriminatory power. Levofloxacin resistance was associated with unclustered strains of M. intracellulare.

关 键 词:Nontuberculous mycobacterium  Phenotype GENOTYPE SUSCEPTIBILITY Resistance 

分 类 号:R446.5[医药卫生—诊断学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象