“执行难”化解之误区及其归正  

Misunderstanding on the Solution to “Enforcement Difficulties” and Its Correction

作　　者：张榕[1] ZHANG Rong(School of Law, Xiamen University, Xiamen361005, Fujian)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第4期82-91,共10页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"法治中国视阈下的司法与政治关系研究"(14BFX002);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"法理学前沿问题研究"(20720171006)

摘　　要：长期以来,学界及实务界一直将"执行难"的成因归结为"执行体制未理顺、地方保护主义严重、执行不力"等,但历经多年的改革以及法院系统遍寻破解良方,"执行难"不但没有消解反有逐步强化的态势。法院独有的"执行难"困局,究其实质在于信用制度的缺失。建构全国统一、协调共治的信用惩戒机制,是逐步克减法院"执行难"的必由之路。同时,尝试引入法律服务中介机构,协助法院分流诉讼与执行压力,亦不失为化解民事司法危机之可行的改革进路。For a long time, China has attributed the causes of ＂enforcement difficulties＂ to the ＂unsmooth enforce- ment system, local protectionism, and poor enforcement. ＂ After many years of efforts on the part of the court system to ex- plore solutions, ＂enforcement difficulties＂ have not been eliminated; rather, they have increased steadily. The crux of this issue, which is unique to China, lies in the lack of a credit system. Therefore, establishing a credit punishment mechanism that is unified, harmonized and jointly governed at the national level is the inevitable path we must take to reduce ＂enforce- ment difficulties＂ in China. In addition, introducing legal service intermediaries to assist courts in alleviating litigation and enforcement pressure is also a feasible path of reform to resolve the civil judicial crisis in China.

关 键 词：执行难 信用制度 信用惩戒机制 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]