精神分析理论的三个偏颇——德勒兹的一种批判性分析  

Three Biases in Psychoanalytic Theory——Delescluze's a kind of critical analyses

作　　者：崔增宝[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学公共管理学院,郑州450001

出　　处：《学术交流》2017年第8期55-60,共6页Academic Exchange

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"德勒兹欲望政治哲学研究"(13CZX060);河南省意识形态与社会治理优势特色学科;郑州大学意识形态安全研究中心招标课题"当代法国哲学的意识形态问题研究"(YSXT-2017-021)

摘　　要：德勒兹从三方面批判精神分析理论。其一,他批判精神分析的家庭主义立场。精神分析从狭隘的家庭主义立场来解释社会现象,认为人类文明起源于乱伦禁戒,而宗教和道德是阻止乱伦的现实尝试。其二,他认为,精神分析对俄狄浦斯的理论构建标志着自身的唯心化转向,它赋予了俄狄浦斯始源性的角色,试图用俄狄浦斯解释一切社会现象,所有的言行都简化为"爸爸-妈妈-我"三角结构关系的各种表象。其三,他认为,精神分析歪曲了欲望的本性,欲望的生产性仅仅停留于想象界或幻想界,欲望的生产性被还原为剧场的表象,导致革命性的欲望退化为俄狄浦斯欲望,即乱伦欲望。在他看来,精神分析在某种程度上已堕落为资本主义的意识形态。Delescluze criticized psychoanalytic theory from three aspects. Firstly, he criticized the familisticposition of psychoanalysis. The spirit of analysis attempted to explain the social phenomena in the narrow familyview, that is, the human civilization originated in incest and prohibition, while the religion and the moralitywere the practical prevention against incest. Secondly, he believed that the psychoanalysis of Oedipus theorymarked his own conversion in idealism, which gave Oedipus the original character, attempting to explain allsocial phenomena with Oedipus and simplifying all words and deeds as ' father-mother-I' the triangularstructure for various representations. Thirdly, he held that psychoanalysis distorted the nature of desire, pro-ductive desire only dwelled in the imaginary or fantasy world and was reduced to the theatre appearance, de-grading revolutionary desire to Oedipus desire, namely incest desire. In his view, psychoanalysis was degener-ated into a kind of capitalist ideologies to some extent.

关 键 词：精神分析 家庭主义 俄狄浦斯 唯心主义欲望 

分 类 号：B565.59[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B84-065